Penny is an associate director in the London Commercial Disputes team, which she joined in 2012 after training at Osborne Clarke.
Penny acts on domestic and international disputes conducted through both arbitration and civil litigation, as well as advising on alternative approaches to dispute resolution to meet her clients' objectives. These include formal mechanisms such as mediation, and commercial approaches that minimise cost. She has particular expertise in cartel and competition damages claims, including collective actions, and is familiar with the challenges of cross-border disputes and litigation involving multiple jurisdictions and proceedings.
Penny also has extensive experience in negotiating and managing third party litigation funding arrangements, and has advised on such agreements as an independent third party.
Her practice ranges across Osborne Clarke’s key sectors, with a particular focus on tech, media and comms, including contentious data privacy issues, and contingent workforce solutions. She is also a qualified solicitor advocate.
Prior to joining Osborne Clarke, Penny worked at management level in both public and private sector organisations and also has in-house legal experience, having spent six months in the Commercial department of a global telecoms provider.
Helping you succeed in tomorrow's world
Culture: "As the co-chair of Osborne Clarke's Age Network, I am working with the firm and external organisations to ensure that great employees of all ages get the opportunities and support they need. I know that many of our clients are also starting on this journey and will value team diversity and the chance to share insights."
Online reviews website
Secured the removal of defamatory content from an online reviews website.
Subsidiary of a UK PLC
Advised the subsidiary of a UK PLC on its contract termination dispute with a Middle Eastern state.
Renewable energy
Conducted an expedited arbitration for a provider of renewable energy, with success on all points
Global technology company
Advised on a novel claim for breach of competition law on behalf of a global technology company.
EU technology cartels
Brought Commercial Court claims for damages arising from EU technology cartels.
Professional services company
Advised on claims both by, and against, the client, arising from subcontractor fraud.
Insights
Supreme Court confirms that the expectation of liquidators to identify 'concealed' claims is not the same as that of trading companies
When does the limitation clock on concealed claims start ticking for companies in liquidation?
An appellate court judgment will bring comfort to liquidators of insolvent companies in respect of the limitation periods applicable in...
A reprieve for opt-out class actions in the UK
The Supreme Court's decision in the Merricks v Mastercard litigation opens the door for more mass claims to be brought...
Should a claim be stayed where foreign proceedings arise from the same dispute but are not framed in identical terms?
Osborne Clarke secures a victory in staying a claim brought in England on the basis of proceedings brought in Cyprus...
Trucks cartel: both "opt-in" and "opt-out" damages claims to be considered by the Competition Appeal Tribunal
Following the high-profile failure of the previous attempt at bringing opt-out competition damages proceedings, the Competition Appeal Tribunal is considering...
Competition damages | UK Court of Appeal decision in Mastercard litigation favours claimants in follow-on damages claims
The difficulties of different judges reaching different conclusions in competition law cases are all too apparent from the English litigation...