Will is a patent and IP specialist with extensive expertise in two distinct sectors – life sciences and technology, with a particular interest in the application of artificial intelligence to both - which allows him to draw on his scientific training in biotechnology and neuroscience.
Heading up Osborne Clarke’s UK Life Sciences and Healthcare sector, Will offers strategic IP services to biotech, pharmaceutical and medical device clients, helping them navigate complex landscapes of patent and IP issues. In this, his scientific specialism means he’s well-equipped to advise on the most cutting-edge tech. Will has advised on patents protecting fundamental biotechnologies and blockbuster antibody therapies, and more recently he has advised on medical diagnostics technology employing AI and machine learning for various applications including the diagnosis of heart arrhythmias and the prediction of heart attack risk.
Will’s expertise in technology is equally far reaching. With a technical understanding of the issues relating to telecoms and software, he has advised on global patent litigation issues involving GPS tracking systems, video on demand, electronic program guides, RFID technology and air traffic control systems. He also has a specialism in copyright and database right matters, proprietary data and trade secrets, acting for software engineers and book publishers, architects and database owners. Will has been involved in a number of multi-jurisdictional commercial matters, including complex worldwide securitisations of future patent royalty streams and other patent-focussed deals.
Will is a solicitor advocate with Higher Rights of Audience and has been involved in IP litigation at all levels of the UK courts, often as part of an integrated team of specialists from European countries in a co-ordinating role for international clients.
Always a champion of innovation, Will advised Drs Kelly and Chiu against GE Healthcare on the first-ever successful employee inventor compensation claim in the UK and continues to advise clients, both employer companies and employee inventors, in this area.
Will is a prominent figure in the wider UK life sciences community, sitting on the BioIndustry Association's IP Advisory Committee and its sub-committee on AI, and is also an active member of the European Patent Lawyers Association (EPLAW) and the AIPPI.
Will is a ranked lawyer in all of the key legal directories – Legal 500, Who's Who Legal for 'pharma and biotech' as well as 'patents', IAM Patent 1000, Juve Patents and is also an MIP IP Star.
‘Will James is a warm and thoughtful leader of a litigation team. He is always on top of the technical detail, and making excellent contributions to the right strategy, but at the same time clearly feels able to trust his team to an appropriate degree to allow the client’s money to be spent most efficiently. It is impressive to watch."
Insights
Debate intensifies over a vaccine IP waiver's impact on future pharma and biotech discoveries
Does a proposed patent suspension backed by Washington open a Pandora's box for vaccine R&D and investment?
Queen's Speech 2021 sets out ambitious agenda for UK life sciences and healthcare
New parliamentary term will be packed with legislation for life sciences and healthcare businesses
Would a global vaccine IP waiver stifle future biopharma breakthroughs?
Pressure for an IP rights waiver to fight the pandemic threatens vaccine companies' ability to develop and protect their trade...
Where next for intellectual property protection and artificial intelligence in the UK?
The government's recent response to views on the implications of AI for IP policy highlights the need to consider protections...
'Crown use' defence in patent infringement claims hinges on authorisation
Appellate-level analysis of rarely used defence limits up-front protection for suppliers of goods and services to government
Judicial changes strengthen English Patents Court
Recent high-profile appointments and developments will bolster the UK's reputation as a forum for litigating complex patent disputes
A new bag of tricks? Obvious if it could have been done before (says the Patents Court)
In order to establish obviousness for the purposes of a patent application, it is enough to show that the idea...
Unwired Planet unpacked: are English courts the de facto global tribunal for SEP licensing disputes?
Is the UK now effectively the forum for determining global FRAND licence terms, and, if so, is that a bad...
Supreme Court Unwired Planet case unpacked: where will implementers turn next in FRAND disputes?
Landmark final appeal ruling means implementers of standards will now face the prospect of the English court setting worldwide licence...
A unified patent court for Europe: the coup de grâce?
Will we ever see the Unified Patent Court operate? Many have doubts, as its path – already long and difficult...
UK Supreme Court upholds appeal by biotech firm Kymab to revoke antibody patents held by US giant Regeneron
Judgment overturns the Court of Appeal's decision on ground-breaking technology, rebalances the legal equilibrium on sufficiency, and grants reprieve to...